GL UD
I'm wondering why you took the cavs team under, and not the celtics team under?
4 games average:
celts- 40% fg----> 81ppg
cavs- 40% fg----> 85ppg
I understand that the cavs only put up 72 & 73 in the 1st 2games (but that was at 30%fg & 35%fg)
But considering the team total for boston is 92.5, and they have been solid at 40%fg,
(gm1-42%, gm2-40%, gm3-40%, gm4-38%)
(gm1-76pts, gm2-89pts, gm3-84pts, gm4-77pts)
Isn't there better value on the celts under?
