Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinsfan
There is a HUGE difference you are intentionally avoiding fish.... Sarah Palin has actually governed in a respectable manner (allowing the people to decide) when she had nothing at stake. Obama "renounced" the more radical views only when it became politically expedient and necessary.... and then lied to everyone by saying he was rarely there (only, in his book, he told you that you could always find him at that church on sundays)... in his book, he brags about his mentor (Frank, i think it was) who turns out to be a known communist in America doing the bidding of Moscow.....
|
Ha ha, lets talk political expediency. Like McCain suddenly kissing up to the christain right when he needed the nomination? I mean, in 2000, he was against the Bush cuts, then when that didnt work, he was for them.
Obama was part of that Church because when you live in Chicago and you want to get into politics, that is where you have to go to network. Besides, if we are going to talk about politicians and lies, good luck with that. Every single one does... personally, its just a matter of which ones have been lying for the least amount of time.
Even if Obama is a communist, radical islamist (how he could be both is a mystery to me - those are on the opposite sides of the political spectrum), baby raping, shit eating bastard - he would be unable to act on it as the President anyway. I am pretty sure the day he imposes homosexual sharia law
I think it is much more likely that he is merely ambitious, like most politicians, and made whatever friends he had to based on who he met along the way. And summarily dumped those relationships when they became a burden. Just like, I dunno, every other politician in national office, including McCain.
Its a dirty, nasty business. Makes me want to take a shower after discussing it. The choices are almost always between a giant douche and a shit sandwich.