Rampage won't get KO'd no matter what...
Throw value out the window?! WTF, betting is about VALUE. Diaz, Trigg, and Hendo at Pride 33 all had great value at about the same range (+200), and they ALL won. Lawler at Icon (which I cashed in on) had great value at an even greater number, HE WON. So you're saying neither fighter has value? How in the **** can you say Rampage doesn't have value at +240 when he made Chuck his bitch in Pride?! If you think either fighter has progressed alot since then, you're insane. If you think Chuck's so called "injury" lost it for him, thats BS as well.
Eddie - What parts of the match does Chuck have a CLEAR advantage in if they both show up....
As far as the eastman fight - even quinton said he was tentative as far as being in the UFC for the first time and it being a MUST win... it definitely showed. Theres no way in hell he shows up like that against Chuck. In regards to Matt Lindland, I don't care who is fighting him, its gonna be a damn hard fight. Lindland would be 185 lb champ in UFC. Did I see Wand break down Rampage? Yes, don't ask me what I've seen lol, I've seen it all, I'm not an MMA noob. When was the last time Chuck fought someone on Shogun or Wand's level??!?!? By the way, the rib breaking in the shogun fight is hard to even look at that fight from a clear POV. This is Chuck's hardest fight IN A WHILE... if both show up 100% rampage has more than a "good chance", I'd say its 80% / 20% in favor of Quinton. While that may seem insane, you simply can't say the matchup favors Chuck AT ALL.
I'm just trying to help some people out who don't follow UFC. If you think Chuck is a value at -200 and over, all I gotta say is good luck.
Link to the first fight for those interested -
YouTube - Chuck Liddell gets his ass kicked in PRIDE!