![]() Lots of betting options! Takes Visa cards like a hot knife through butter! Click Here To Sign Up Click Here For the Review | ![]() Very generous signup bonuses! Best at processing credit cards! Click Here To Sign Up Click Here For The Review | ![]() Tired of your credit card not working at sportsbooks? No problem here! Click Here To Sign Up Click Here For the Review | ![]() Save BIG money by betting on games at -105 reduced odds! Click Here To Sign Up Click Here For the Review |
| Quick Site Links: NFL Football | College Football | NBA Basketball | College Basketball | MLB Baseball | NHL Hockey | Soccer | |
| More Site Links: Boxing | NASCAR | Golf | Horse Racing | Sportsbooks | Sports Betting | Sports Handicapping | Handicappers | Superbowl | |
| Online Poker: Poker | Texas Holdem | Omaha Poker | Poker Rooms | Poker Tournaments | |
| Casino Gambling: Slots | Blackjack | Video Poker | Craps | Roulette | Baccarat | Keno | Online Casinos | |
|
|||||||
| College Football Make your NCAA football picks against the spread and share regional tips and info with others from around the world. Get more free picks and info in our college football betting section as well! |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Adding:
Arizona -10 at New Mexico (2 units) LOSS Arizona has set the world afire on offense thus far, averaging better than 55ppg. Meanwhile, New Mexico can't seem to figure how to: a) hang onto the football (-5 TO ratio); and b) find the endzone. They were held to 3 points in a 23-point loss to TCU and needed two late cheap TDs to make the game against a mediocre A&M team look respectable. I don't think Arizona is going to score 55 this game, but 35 is very possible. Given the way New Mexico's offense has looked I don't see them scoring more than a couple TDs. If they don't secure the football, giving Arizona's O short fields to work with will spell doom. I like Arizona by 14-20. I'll say Arizona 34 New Mexico 16. The only thing I don't particular like with my plays this week is that (so far) I got three away favs. Oh well, I pick 'em as I see 'em. ![]()
__________________
2010 CFB: 39-33-0 (ATS) 2010-2011 CBB: 26-24-0 (ATS) Last edited by MParris86; 09-14-2008 at 12:07 AM.. |
|
||||
|
GL on your picks bud, well done last week. Jumped on the GA early line with you and looking at both Cal and Arizona here. Bol to you on your plays
__________________
MMA: 41-53-1 // 43.62% // -2.88 units MLB: 13-23-0 // 36.11% // -2.35 units MLB Underdog System: 32-3 // 91.43% // +28.66 units Updated on 05/14/12 --- One of my 2012 resolutions: no more action gambling. NFL 11: 49-42-4 // 53.84% // +7.40 units NCAAB 11: 25-21-0 // 54.35% // +1.90 units NHL 11: 122-118-0 // 50.83% // +14.98 units NCAAF 10-11: 78-81-2 // 49.06% // -27.00 units MLB 10: 148-126-1 // 54.01% // +25.43 units NBA 10: 130-120-3 // 52.00% // +15.31 units |
|
||||
|
I came oh so close last week to hitting my teaser, so I'll try again this week.
6-team, 7pt teaser (2 units to win 8 units) Memphis +10.5 at Marshall Virginia +17.5 at UConn OSU +17.5 at USC Washington +27.5 vs. Oklahoma Navy +8.5 at Duke Rice +14 at Vanderbilt A little reasoning: Memphis can score some pts and Marshall isn't that good; UConn's offense is too anemic to cover a big #; all eyes on OSU to at least keep it respectable; Lots o' points for Washington at home; Duke should never give a team more than a TD; Rice has enough firepower to stick around plus possibility for a Vandy letdown. Anyways, this is just for fun. I don't add teasers or parlays into my YTD regardless of win or loss. That'll probably be it for me this week. Don't really like the card that much this week. BOL everyone! ![]()
__________________
2010 CFB: 39-33-0 (ATS) 2010-2011 CBB: 26-24-0 (ATS) |
|
|||
|
Nice start MP....keep up the good work. Thanks for the info on Nev+27....missed that info myself. That really helps.
__________________
YTD CFB'09 season(as of 1/7) Reg season RESULTS:(-12.98 U's) BOWLS Sides: 8-21(-20.5 U's) O/U's: 2-6(-1.25 U's) ML's: 2-6(-0.70 U's) RESULTS(-22.45 U's) NFL'09 season(as of 1/3) SIDES: 59-51-3(-1.3 U's) O/U's: 15-19-2(-3.95 U's) ML's: 5-13(-2.47 U's) 2H's: 8-9(-0.65 U'S) RESULTS:(-7.67 U's) CBB'09-'10 season(as of 1/9) SIDES: 109-101-4(-.25 U's) O/U'S: 28-16(+6.50 U's) ML's 2-3 (+0.2 U's) RESULTS:(+6.45 U's) "I WANT THEIRS!!" fitter, on new health care program |
|
||||
|
Ok one more...
Buffalo -6 vs. Temple (2 units) LOSS Temple has an awful run D and Buffalo has a solid running attack. The Owls are giving up 250+ypg on the ground thus far. I've been somewhat impressed with Buffalo so far, they crushed UTEP and they played Pitt even up for 3 quarters but ended up losing late. Temple, meanwhile, wasn't very impressive last week against UConn in what was an offensive pillow fight. Like Buffalo at home here by less than a TD. The Bulls won by 35 last year, so I'm thinking they can cover this #.
__________________
2010 CFB: 39-33-0 (ATS) 2010-2011 CBB: 26-24-0 (ATS) Last edited by MParris86; 09-14-2008 at 12:08 AM.. |
|
||||
|
0-3-1 this week.
Not sure what happened this week...but I have a hunch alot of people had a rough weekend. Some strange outcomes. Surprisingly, I only lost 3.5 units...my biggest play pushed (Georgia) and I hit a 2-team parlay with Baylor/Western Michigan that I didn't have time to post. It won't count on here, but it saved my ass bankroll-wise. Oh well, onto week four...
__________________
2010 CFB: 39-33-0 (ATS) 2010-2011 CBB: 26-24-0 (ATS) |
![]() ![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|