NOTE: Insertion of rule "mid contest"

[Kevin]

An astute forum member has brought it to our attention that there is a loophole in the contest.

Most people here wouldn't stoop to this level, but it's best we cover it now rather than later.

By having the "most posts" tiebreaker, a guy could wait for the first guy to post and then post the exact same plays knowing that he would win on the tiebreaker.

For the record, that won't be allowed. In round 2, you must have at least 2 different games than your opponent.

Starting in round 3, we'll be posting a tiebreaker which will be your guess of total points scored in a game that we list.

Sorry for this mid contest rule change. It didn't cross my mind while drawing up the rules. I ain't even close to the sharpest cookie in the jar lol.

[Q-Unit]

Originally Posted by Kevin

Most people here wouldn't stoop to this level

LMAO

Are you sure about this?

somewhere DJTranks and Baman's ears are ringing...

- not saying they would stoop this low, just historically if anyone would win the most posts tiebreaker, it'd be them.

- besides we all know joepa66 is the shadiest character around these parts, I mean annually he waits til FSU's schedule comes out, then arranges for cupcake matchups against Temple and Kent State to pad his career wins...

- then he somehow jedi-mind (thats the 2nd nerdy reference for me today!) tricks Bowden and the FSU boosters into forced early retiring to seal the deal.

that made no sense, but then again I started drinking early today...

[Meestermike]

I wanna refund...