The Masters

[CuseFan10]

100/1....Ouch, Cuse...nice (almost) call...

Congrats to Immelman... :thumbs:

I WANT TO DIG A HOLE AND TAKE A NAP IN IT...... :face:

[JohnnyMapleLeaf]

100/1....Ouch, Cuse...nice (almost) call...

Congrats to Immelman... :thumbs:

[CuseFan10]

Actually...I guess its 6 strokes back...even more unlikely! lol

:laughing:



:thumbs:

[JohnnyMapleLeaf]

lol...I just meant he shot a good number, and got himself on the leaderboard (and with a few more putts it coulda been about a 65)...geez...

5 strokes back? Unlikely, but stranger things have happened, dude...

Actually...I guess its 6 strokes back...even more unlikely! lol

[JohnnyMapleLeaf]

People keep saying this, "Tiger is lurking". Tiger is not lurking. He's 5 shots back at the Masters with 18 holes left. That's not "lurking". If Immelman shoots a 74 (which he probably won't because his swing off the tee looks as pure as anyone could ever dream right now), Tiger still needs to shoot a 68 just to beat him. Tiger is done with regard to winning the tournament, IMHO... He is playing the par 5's like I would (in my dreams) for whatever reason, and for his career he's OVER par on the rest of the holes combined. Not to mention, Tiger has never won a major after trailing after 54 holes. He's a front running bully. He's the best ever at it, but that's what he is (in majors at least).

Immelman will not give it up to Tiger. Maybe Snedecker, Casey (who left a ton of opportunities on the course and coul've shot a really low number), or Flesch can clip him if he stumbles but Tiger has no chance of winning IMHO, and is not "lurking".

This happens to me without fail. Three years ago, Federer won like 71 matches in a row and then I randomly bet on him in a semifinal and he lost. I'll never forget it. I'm not saying betting Tiger this week was smart, but every time I play a strong, strong fave like this it doesn't win. You'd think I'd learn??? Haha...

AND WORSE, I LISTED THE ****ER WHO'S GOING TO POSSIBLY WIN AT 100 TO 1, AND DIDN'T BET HIM.

:toss:

lol...I just meant he shot a good number, and got himself on the leaderboard (and with a few more putts it coulda been about a 65)...geez...

5 strokes back? Unlikely, but stranger things have happened, dude...

[JohnnyMapleLeaf]

I'd like to see Snedeker.

yeah...did Phil ever collapse! lmao...

[CuseFan10]

wow...Immelman looking good...

Tiger lurking...

People keep saying this, "Tiger is lurking". Tiger is not lurking. He's 5 shots back at the Masters with 18 holes left. That's not "lurking". If Immelman shoots a 74 (which he probably won't because his swing off the tee looks as pure as anyone could ever dream right now), Tiger still needs to shoot a 68 just to beat him. Tiger is done with regard to winning the tournament, IMHO... He is playing the par 5's like I would (in my dreams) for whatever reason, and for his career he's OVER par on the rest of the holes combined. Not to mention, Tiger has never won a major after trailing after 54 holes. He's a front running bully. He's the best ever at it, but that's what he is (in majors at least).

Immelman will not give it up to Tiger. Maybe Snedecker, Casey (who left a ton of opportunities on the course and coul've shot a really low number), or Flesch can clip him if he stumbles but Tiger has no chance of winning IMHO, and is not "lurking".

This happens to me without fail. Three years ago, Federer won like 71 matches in a row and then I randomly bet on him in a semifinal and he lost. I'll never forget it. I'm not saying betting Tiger this week was smart, but every time I play a strong, strong fave like this it doesn't win. You'd think I'd learn??? Haha...

AND WORSE, I LISTED THE ****ER WHO'S GOING TO POSSIBLY WIN AT 100 TO 1, AND DIDN'T BET HIM.

:toss:

[CuseFan10]

It's Mickelson's to lose, IMO. He's in perfect position to get his 3rd Green Jacket methinks...

Nice call dude, stick to hockey, hahaha :laughing:

[JohnnyMapleLeaf]

wow...Immelman looking good...

Tiger lurking...

[JohnnyMapleLeaf]

It's Mickelson's to lose, IMO. He's in perfect position to get his 3rd Green Jacket methinks...


I'm rooting for Weir to get his second though!

[Nigel Tufnel]

I like Immelman, but I don't think you'll have to worry about being ill this weekend. He has played two wonderful rounds, but now that its the weekend, his butthole is going to pucker and with the windy conditions, I don't think he'll be able to handle the pressure of being the leader through Sunday.

If he does it, it would be pretty amazing. I wouldn't mind him winning at all (except the result of you being ill..lol), but something tells me he won't be able to finish this thing off.

We'll see. GL. You can get him at 6/1 right now to win...lol.

[CuseFan10]

If I had to play a couple guys I think I'd take some combo of Harrington @ 25/1, Rose @ 35/1, Stricker @ 50/1, Stenson @ 60/1, and Immelman @ 100/1.

I am going to be very ill if Immelman wins this tournament. :bang:

[CuseFan10]

Man, I haven't watched Sportscenter or the Golf Channel yet this week...is Ogilvy the trendy pick? Crap. You're right...the sexy picks never win.

Sportscenter talks about sports? When? :laughing:

[Nigel Tufnel]

Man, I haven't watched Sportscenter or the Golf Channel yet this week...is Ogilvy the trendy pick? Crap. You're right...the sexy picks never win.

[CuseFan10]

My Masters Play

Just the Tiger bet for now. He's only 1/100 to make the cut!!!! :laughing:

4 UNITS
Tiger Woods to WIN the Masters @ 6/5

:thumbs:

Might post some match-ups too, but don't want to get cute with this. There's more value in Tiger winning wire to wire, but he sometimes plays unspectacular on Thursdays so I layed off that angle. This way he has all four days to do his damage and I'm happy with the 6/5. I see absolutely no value in betting anyone else to be totally honest. The chances of anyone else winning aren't that great IMHO, and the chances of any of us picking out that guy who slays the dragon is far less likely. Ogilvy is the sexy pick, but those kind of plays never win (no offense to anyone who likes him, as he's also one of my favorites). If I had to play a couple guys I think I'd take some combo of Harrington @ 25/1, Rose @ 35/1, Stricker @ 50/1, Stenson @ 60/1, and Immelman @ 100/1.