First Half vs Second Half CBB

Shamrock

Member

Join Date: Mar 2007

Posts: 612
- Share
- Tweet
#1

First Half vs Second Half CBB

01-09-2008, 09:28 AM

I have been gravitating toward more 1st and 2nd half wagering as of late, and last night is a prime example of why I am doing so.

If you notice, the team leading at half time, in a very high percentage of last nights games, gets outscored in the 2nd. Now, I'm not saying that they didnt cover, and I truly dont care enough to break down all the numbers, but I'm really curious as to why. What pep talk are these coaches giving the teams down at half, or why does the leading team have this inability to sustain their drive after a 15 minute break? Are adjustments that powerful? I wouldnt bring this up normally, but it really is a prominent issue this year more so than any other I can remember the past 10 years.

I'm on home dogs first half for the rest of the year..........

___________
CFB: 25-28-1 (+3)

NFL: 14-12 (+7.75)

CBB: 07-08: 54-43(+11.25) RD 3-1
Tags: None
fitter

Imposter

Join Date: Mar 2007

Posts: 573
- Share
- Tweet
#2

01-09-2008, 10:33 AM

find it kind of courious that this appears to be happening as well. Favs covering in 1st H, then allowing the cover to slip away in 2nd H for game appears to be more prominent this year. See if you can get time to track this Sham. BOL with this method, it may be something I try as well. Will be looking at it for sure. :thumbs:

YTD
CFB'09 season(as of 1/7)
Reg season RESULTS:(-12.98 U's)
BOWLS
Sides: 8-21(-20.5 U's)
O/U's: 2-6(-1.25 U's)
ML's: 2-6(-0.70 U's)
RESULTS(-22.45 U's)
NFL'09 season(as of 1/3)
SIDES: 59-51-3(-1.3 U's)
O/U's: 15-19-2(-3.95 U's)
ML's: 5-13(-2.47 U's)
2H's: 8-9(-0.65 U'S)
RESULTS:(-7.67 U's)
CBB'09-'10 season(as of 1/9)
SIDES: 109-101-4(-.25 U's)
O/U'S: 28-16(+6.50 U's)
ML's 2-3 (+0.2 U's)
RESULTS:(+6.45 U's)

"I WANT THEIRS!!" fitter, on new health care program
Comment

Announcement

First Half vs Second Half CBB

Comment