Why did AF go for 2?????????????

[Shamrock]

:conf:

[FlyersFan]

so those who had +4 1/2 could cover their bets....:laughing:

[RahStahMan]

so those who had +4 1/2 could cover their bets....:laughing:

:thumbs:
:laughing:

i didnt understand it either but i was rooting for it

[hook11050]

HAHA....just posted the same thing, was really confused and almost very upset...Coach Calhoun dropped a hammer on his own team?? haha:laughing:

[bestbet425]

Calhoun and Deberry probably had a wager on AF and were going for the cover...lol... but man if they got it i would of felt bad for those ppl that were on Cal.. cuz that was wrong...bol

[EddieP]

Calhoun and Deberry probably had a wager on AF and were going for the cover...lol... but man if they got it i would of felt bad for those ppl that were on Cal.. cuz that was wrong...bol

****en right they had a bet, down by 6 no reason what so ever to go for 2 none

[Stifler's Mom]

DUmbasses, I agree. Would have been nice if they would have made it though.

Maybe they were thinking "Cut it to 4, in case CAL gets a FG?" LMFAO

Where the hell did that QB for CAL come from anyway? That team sucked the entire 2nd half of the season....until he played. And who's the einstein that didn't play him sooner?