Tweet
One early play:
ASStros/****ty Nats over 8.5 -115
2 units
ASStros/****ty Nats over 8.5 -115
2 units
-
-
adding:
Flubs +107
Seattle/Texas over 8 +105
2 units each -
-
Jeff Samardghajdgruyagergia should have stuck to playing wide receiver...
updated ytd:
reg plays 120-122 (-22.59 units)
fave rl's 38-74 (-9.44 units)
overall 158-196 (-32.03 units)
faves who won 1 by run: 19 of 112 (16.96%)
Detroit -107
Boston +110
Milwaukee -103
Florida -118
Atlanta -123
San Diego +100
LA Dodgers/Arizona under 9 -120
2 units each
Detroit rl +170
Milwaukee rl +150
Florida rl +170
Atlanta rl +165
San Diego rl +200
1/2 unit each
Took the -1.5 rl's on Milwaukee and San Diego because they opened as faves, and that's how the line is still posted at the book i'm using, despite the lines being actual dog lines now.
Trusting JEFF Weaver to not get lit up tonight against a club who normally doesn't lite the world on fire offensively. He looked real sharp in relief last week.
Why does Vicente Padilla suck against 28 mlb teams, pitch for 1 of them, and own the 30th? WTF? :dunno:Comment
-
stif, are they going to pay you on that Nats/Asstros total?Comment
-
Yea, they paid me. I was worried weather they would or not, but they did. According to the rules on sportsbook.com all totals and runlines are action after 9 innings (8.5 if the home team is ahead). I assume any other reputable books paid the over as a winner as well.
From what I understand, all moneyline bets should have been graded as a push. +1.5 runlines and over bets should have been graded as winners, and all -1.5 runlines and unders as losers.
Got lucky as hell on that Texas/Seattle over, but I'll take it :beerbang:Comment
Comment