-
Yea...exactly
If you can just pick a winner tonight you should have it.
So do you take Philly -6.5
OR
Washington on the ML
??Leave a comment:
-
lmfao......what the hell good is a system if the guy operating it can't pick the winner SU....that would be me...:blackeye: ....i honestly don't know how anyone does well at this sport.....Leave a comment:
-
Yep....Stiffler's little deal worked to perfection again this week.
The whole trick is picking the right winners LOL
Chicago was a no play (line over 7)
San Francisco won outright (nice dog ML payout)
Pittsburgh was a no play (line over 7)
Green Bay won outright (another nice dog ML payout if you went that way)
Jacksonville was a no play (line over 7)
Cleveland was a no play (line over 7...but what kind of ML could you have got on that?)
Houston won outright (huge ML payout)
Tampa Bay won outright (another nice ML payout)
Arizona won outright (yet another nice ML payout)
Dallas won and covered
Baltimore was a no play (line over 7)
Denver was a no play (line over 7)
New England won and covered
Detroit and Minnesota was a push for most (line of 3)
Indianapolis was the only team that won but did not cover...and that was on a line that landed on 7 (not that 6.5 would have mattered)
Lot of doggies this weekend!Leave a comment:
-
-
Oakland, Atlanta, KC and NYJ had spreads of over +7. So they don't count. It is only for games where the spread is +/-7 or less.
Detroit pushed, right? I didn't play the game or have any interest in it, but I believe the line was DET -3?
Only real loser in the "system" was INDY/TEN where TEN lost but covered the +7.Leave a comment:
-
Modeposter Stifler's Mom
Moderator + Poster = Modeposter. get it? LOL
hey Stif you notice that the "bet on the spread, who you think will win" hypotheses didn't fair so well yesterday?
out of my own bets:
Atlanta
Kansas City
the others were:
Indianapolis
NY Jets
Oakland
I know its just one week, but that has to be more than the norm right?
-kills some ML action I can tell you that :bang:
Leave a comment: