Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This here NFL Playoffs!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This here NFL Playoffs!

    Regular Season: 48-34-2 // 58.54% // +42.40 units

    Wildcard playoffs:

    Green Bay Packers -7.5 vs Minnesota Vikings: At first this line was a bit puzzling - topping out around 9.5/10 but the sharp money has been back and forth on this line. It has come out within the last day or so that Joe Webb has been taking most of the first-team snaps. Frazier has used this tactic a couple of times during his head-coaching tenure to trick the opposing coaches to game plan vs Joe Webb, but Twitter has been going nuts this morning. Reports out of 1500 ESPN Twin Cities has Ponder has a serious case of bursitis in his throwing elbow. This is the same elbow that has given him some serious trouble in college. He was listed as Questionable throughout the week but now signs are pointing to being downgraded even from then. Normally some questionable Vikings fans would have clammored for Joe Webb to be given the rock, but this year he hasn't had any playing time (no regular season snaps). If he had SOME game time (much less a road playoff game), we would think this would cause the Packers to stop the inside blitz and thus prevent Webb from getting outside. This would also free up AP to run up the middle... it's a completely different game plan vs the QB.
    Now, with the Vikings playing well in the second half of the season, and especially Christian Ponder playing well and mostly mistake-free... there is no doubt in my mind that if he does play, he'll need that elbow drained, and with the temperatures in Green Bay at night, he will not be at 100 percent. In order to pull off a big upset here on the road, in playoffs (last road playoff win was in 2004 at Green Bay), Ponder would have to make a few more plays than he did last week. I don't see that happening.
    A case for Green Bay, if you needed one, is that they'll have Randall Cobb healthy - another weapon to hurt a depleted Vikings secondary. If Antoine Winfield plays, he won't be at 100 percent, and he'll have that hand wrapped. That will severely limit his bump-and-run coverage and his ability to tackle. Without that a part of his gameplan, he's an undersized cornerback.

    I'm going all-out here for the Packers, with 22 units to win 20 and cover the 7.5. I have other bets online that I won't post here (only post my local bets), but they do consist of 16 units and 10 units on other sites.

    Cincinnati Bengals/Houston Texans o43
    for four units - predicting a 24-21 Houston victory. I actually like both teams establishing the run early and lighting it up in the second half via the pass.
    NFL 17: 45-47-2 // 48.91% // -10.12
    MMA: 247-332-2 // 42.66% // -6.04
    MLB 17: 151-140-8 // 51.89% // +5.65 ROR // +42.13
    NCAAF 17: 63-49-2 // 56.25% // +6.80
    Updated on 01/13/18
    ---
    One of my 2018 resolutions: no more action gambling.

  • #2
    Backup Joe Webb took more reps in practice this week and was pulled aside by coach Leslie Frazier after Thursday's practice, along with third-stringer McLeod Bethel-Thompson, who may be active for the first time all season.

    -1500espn.com
    NFL 17: 45-47-2 // 48.91% // -10.12
    MMA: 247-332-2 // 42.66% // -6.04
    MLB 17: 151-140-8 // 51.89% // +5.65 ROR // +42.13
    NCAAF 17: 63-49-2 // 56.25% // +6.80
    Updated on 01/13/18
    ---
    One of my 2018 resolutions: no more action gambling.

    Comment


    • #3
      Lets' finish it Packers.....GL AK!
      Batman: "If you can't spend it, money's just a lot of worthless paper, isn't it?" :phew:

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks Coach! Was nice to hit the big bet.

        Seattle -2.5 vs Washington: Seattle and more specifically Russell Wilson have been playing amazing the last few months. Russell Wilson comes back home to DC, got a lot of family there. He'll be able to move the ball better than RG3 I believe. RG3's knee is going to be an issue if he wants to cut in and out. I think this limits his mobility and the Seattle defense will not have to worry about the receivers getting behind them. I like Seattle to finish up a chalky Wild Card weekend.

        Eight units!
        Last edited by akatdrake; 01-06-2013, 04:26 PM.
        NFL 17: 45-47-2 // 48.91% // -10.12
        MMA: 247-332-2 // 42.66% // -6.04
        MLB 17: 151-140-8 // 51.89% // +5.65 ROR // +42.13
        NCAAF 17: 63-49-2 // 56.25% // +6.80
        Updated on 01/13/18
        ---
        One of my 2018 resolutions: no more action gambling.

        Comment


        • #5
          great hit on the big one! The seattle game is in washington though, just fyi.

          Comment


          • #6
            Thanks Daws, I appreciate it.
            NFL 17: 45-47-2 // 48.91% // -10.12
            MMA: 247-332-2 // 42.66% // -6.04
            MLB 17: 151-140-8 // 51.89% // +5.65 ROR // +42.13
            NCAAF 17: 63-49-2 // 56.25% // +6.80
            Updated on 01/13/18
            ---
            One of my 2018 resolutions: no more action gambling.

            Comment


            • #7
              Have to scrounge up my YTDs everywhere, but did well last week!

              Baltimore at Denver -9, 45.5: I think Baltimore left everything out on the field last week for Ray Lewis's retirement game, I don't know what they'll have in the tank this year. People saying Denver is going to be cold, Peyton going to wear a glove. Please, like they haven't ever played in cold, and Peyton is top-whatever of all-time. The guy is going to be able to throw the ball with a glove on. I don't think those are going to be factors at all, except the teams might run the ball a little first off. Do you trust Joe Flacco on the road in a playoff game? I sure as heck don't... and I'm not even getting double digits? I cannot figure out any reasons for each team to win vs the other, at any spread short of ridiculous... so I'm going to pass on this one. Should be a fun one to watch though.

              Green Bay at San Francisco -3, 45: Does anyone want to bet against Green Bay lately? Even with the loss in the Metrodome, he still went for 365 and four tds with no picks. It looks to me he is on a mission. I think the no-huddle will be especially important this game vs the SF defense. Spreading them out and quick hits vs the blitz will decide this game. It will also be tough to keep blitzing after Rodgers gets by it a few times early. I think the change at QB was not what SF needed, and I think it's going to show today. Regardless of who starts, I'm sure both QBs will get some playing time. I think both of them need to be 100% or they're not going to be able to keep up with the GB offense. All angles aside, I think last year was SF's year, and they missed it because of a couple of special teams gaffes. I'm going with GB +3 for eight units and maybe the overs. I see something like 28-24 GB win. I think it's possible we have a bad beat on the total with two kickers who have been no-short of awful this year, but we will see. I just see GB, and especially Rodgers, playing as well has he did a couple of years back during the SB run.
              Last edited by akatdrake; 01-12-2013, 03:10 PM.
              NFL 17: 45-47-2 // 48.91% // -10.12
              MMA: 247-332-2 // 42.66% // -6.04
              MLB 17: 151-140-8 // 51.89% // +5.65 ROR // +42.13
              NCAAF 17: 63-49-2 // 56.25% // +6.80
              Updated on 01/13/18
              ---
              One of my 2018 resolutions: no more action gambling.

              Comment


              • #8
                Boy it looks like GB still has a lot of work to do, and SF is the real deal. I was wrong about Smith getting some time to play, but Kaepernick played phenomenal for 99 percent of that game. They will be tough to beat if he can keep that up. That being said, the Vikings had the read-option going vs the Packers on that first drive and the Packers couldn't stop it then, either.

                Today we have Seattle at Atlanta -2.5, 46: I really like Atlanta here. No one is talking about them. Seattle and Russell Wilson seem to be the Cinderella team lately, and I think that's why we dont have this line around 4/4.5. I think Atlanta's receivers match up well vs the Seattle secondary, despite Richard Sherman and Browner having alright years. I think the physicality of the Dirty Birds will do well down the field. Also lets not forget Seattle had to travel to Washington last week, then home to Seattle, and now out to Atlanta. This seems very huge and draining, especially playing a team on rest. It looks like the line is moving toward Atlanta as it's around 3, and could get to 4 by kickoff. I really don't want to fade Matt Ryan, but we all know he has to win a big game... hopefully today is it. My play is Atlanta -2.5 for eight units. Good luck guys.
                NFL 17: 45-47-2 // 48.91% // -10.12
                MMA: 247-332-2 // 42.66% // -6.04
                MLB 17: 151-140-8 // 51.89% // +5.65 ROR // +42.13
                NCAAF 17: 63-49-2 // 56.25% // +6.80
                Updated on 01/13/18
                ---
                One of my 2018 resolutions: no more action gambling.

                Comment


                • #9
                  GL today AK! Love Hotlanta as well....NFC #1 Home Favs are 19-3ATS
                  Batman: "If you can't spend it, money's just a lot of worthless paper, isn't it?" :phew:

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Cool stat coach, where'd you find that one?
                    NFL 17: 45-47-2 // 48.91% // -10.12
                    MMA: 247-332-2 // 42.66% // -6.04
                    MLB 17: 151-140-8 // 51.89% // +5.65 ROR // +42.13
                    NCAAF 17: 63-49-2 // 56.25% // +6.80
                    Updated on 01/13/18
                    ---
                    One of my 2018 resolutions: no more action gambling.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X