In the interests of fairness, HEY DUKE....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • shorts
    replied
    Hummm....

    Hummmmm......interesting....who's this Duke guy? LMAO!!:drunk:

    Leave a comment:


  • Silver & Black
    replied
    this was a great read..thanks guys.

    Bottom line, Duke get's a 3 seed on reputation alone!!
    (actually just wrote something so this would be bumped!)

    Leave a comment:


  • BUNK MORELAND
    replied
    Originally posted by birdsfan5
    I agree with you on the time and money. I spend over 2500 on season tickets to the Eagles every year and I feel I am a part of the team. Also spent 5000 for me and my dad to go to the Super Bowl when the Eagles where in it for that kind of cash I have the right to feel as if i am a part of the team:beerbang:
    I WAS AT THAT SUPER BOWL

    Leave a comment:


  • Skinsfan
    replied
    Originally posted by Horatio
    for the 2006-2007 season, this:

    The ACC, for the umpteenth time, once again leads all conferences in producing NBA players. This season the ACC has 54 former players in the NBA, an average of 4.5 NBA players for each team in the conference, compared to last year's 4.1. The ACC also has every school represented in the NBA, with the remainder of the BCS conferences (Big 12, Big East, Big Ten, SEC, and Pac-10) each missing only a single institution with current NBA representation. Eight conferences have just one team represented in the NBA (including Independents), and five conferences have no NBA players on 2006-07 NBA opening-day rosters. There are 54 foreign players on NBA opening-day rosters, or 12.2% of the NBA total, 35 players that went straight from high school to the NBA (7.9%), and 4 players that attended non-Division I colleges (0.9%). Division I colleges provide the balance of 349 NBA players (79.0%). Foreign players that played in college are counted under the appropriate school listing.
    And yet, this neither argues for nor against the ACC as being the best conference THIS year.... which is what was being debated.

    Leave a comment:


  • BUNK MORELAND
    replied
    Pac 10

    USC

    don't sleep on them .. i think ...

    Leave a comment:


  • jcho201
    replied
    I dont know if anyone is this thread has argued that the ACC is not the most talented conference in the nation. I know for a fact that they have the best individual players in the nation this season, and for many seasons in the past. However in the past few years, i believe that the Big East has been producing more quality teams, and that can be seen in the fact that in the last 4 years, they have sent, on average, more teams to the NCAA tournament and to the sweet sixteen.

    Leave a comment:


  • Horatio
    replied
    One Last Note

    for the 2006-2007 season, this:

    The ACC, for the umpteenth time, once again leads all conferences in producing NBA players. This season the ACC has 54 former players in the NBA, an average of 4.5 NBA players for each team in the conference, compared to last year's 4.1. The ACC also has every school represented in the NBA, with the remainder of the BCS conferences (Big 12, Big East, Big Ten, SEC, and Pac-10) each missing only a single institution with current NBA representation. Eight conferences have just one team represented in the NBA (including Independents), and five conferences have no NBA players on 2006-07 NBA opening-day rosters. There are 54 foreign players on NBA opening-day rosters, or 12.2% of the NBA total, 35 players that went straight from high school to the NBA (7.9%), and 4 players that attended non-Division I colleges (0.9%). Division I colleges provide the balance of 349 NBA players (79.0%). Foreign players that played in college are counted under the appropriate school listing.

    Leave a comment:


  • FearTheRaven
    replied
    I like the Big 12 for my bracket this year.

    Don't steal my teams, Texas A&M and Kansas.

    Both teams go far, unless KU has to play Bradley 1st round, haha.

    Big 10 is hard to decipher

    ACC is down this year, but really watch out next year they will be back on top easily.

    Leave a comment:


  • FearTheRaven
    replied
    Originally posted by Skinsfan
    I just wanted to make sure feartheraven knew i wasn't out just to get maryland fans.
    :beerbang: I thought you were a dook fan damn you.

    But if you can bash dook I can get a long with ya.

    Leave a comment:


  • GamblinMan03
    replied
    Wake beating GTech with 9:20 left...Who would have expected the 9,10,11,12 ACC seeds to win today? If Wake holds on, the unthinkable happens...WOW

    Leave a comment:


  • Skinsfan
    replied
    Originally posted by GamblinMan03
    Im a MAAC guy myself:beer2:

    Ain't got **** on the SWAC

    Leave a comment:


  • GamblinMan03
    replied
    Originally posted by CuseFan10
    I know I know.....

    The MEAC rocks!!!!!!
    Im a MAAC guy myself:beer2:

    Leave a comment:


  • Skinsfan
    replied
    Originally posted by CuseFan10
    I know I know.....

    The MEAC rocks!!!!!!

    shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

    keep it a secret

    Leave a comment:


  • CuseFan10
    replied
    Originally posted by Skinsfan
    Yes, in all honesty i agree.... but secretly, you and I both know which conference is more fun to watch.
    I know I know.....

    The MEAC rocks!!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Skinsfan
    replied
    Originally posted by CuseFan10
    Hahaha, honestly though. I think I made good points and I think I'm right. Taking emotion and bias out of it, no one knows which conference is better because they are almost exactly the same.

    :spin:
    Yes, in all honesty i agree.... but secretly, you and I both know which conference is more fun to watch.

    Leave a comment:

Working...