Week 7 Discussion
Collapse
X
-
-
:ohman:
At first glance Kentucky & Louisville may seem to be getting too many points, but IMO they could both be in for long days... LSU off a scare vs. Florida, I think they come out focused & pound the ball down Kentucky's throat. The Cardinals are just plain bad defensively, IMO Cincy likely wins by 2td. I have a very hard time seeing either one of these dogs coming close to cashing on the ML, but that's me...
agree but those were not really my 2 stronger money line plays...
im looking into taking
missouri to take down oklahoma
wasshington to give a beat down to ariz st
and these next 2 possibly just based on match ups
auburn
oregonstLeave a comment:
-
I love Purdue and have a feeling the public is going to hammer Michigan in this one.Leave a comment:
-
Likely dog ML plays will be on:
Indiana +5
Bowling Green +2
That's so far, but another game that intrigues me is Buffalo -3.5 against Toledo. Other than Illinois(who scored 27) Buffalo has scored(24) the most points against PSU's defense. That doesn't bode well for a Toledo D that gives up nearly 450 yards of offense per contest.Leave a comment:
-
Well, that pretty much has me sold. Two teams going in very different directions. Plus, the game is not at night in Kinnick, which can be very difficult. 11:00 a.m. game. Think I'll get this one now before the line goes up.
Thanks, hodown for the research...much appreciated.
:thumbs:Leave a comment:
-
and to actually further my case on illinois, just look at the last 3 opponents for each, all of whom are common (indiana, penn state, and wisconsin). heres the breakdown
offense pass rush total
illinois 113 377 490
iowa 208 76 284
defense pass rush total
illinois 317 130 447
iowa 231 165 396
avg score
illinois 28 to 20
iowa 13 to 27
illinois can be had through the air but not by iowa. top 3 receiving threats gone for the year and christensen looks lost in the pocket, at 54% right now. team rushing not helping, avg 3.3 ypc. offensively in the big 10, iowa is last in total yards, last in scoring, last in rushing, second to last in passing.
statistically, the iowa defense has fared much better. but opening with niu, syracuse, isu will help that out. the game against wisky was conservative for both teams, not surprising being that bielema has iowa roots. it was a no-brainer indiana would cut up iowa, because they do every year and parker cant stop the spread. the surprising one was psu, whos very average offense went for 490 total, 257 of that on the ground.
point is, iowa has gotten worse every game of the year since the syracuse game. they looked bad against isu, avg against wisky, very bad against indiana, and terrible against psu. illinois has much better team speed on both sides of the ball, and they have a great chance to go 10-2 this year and earn a possible bcs birth. iowa and illinois dont like each other, so there is a small chance of illinois looking ahead. iowa is +7 in the turnover category this year, so even if illinois turns it over a ton, iowa obviously isnt capitalizing. and the final thought that might scare people is that the game is at kinnick. go check out the message boards at rivals and see how happy fans are right now with the job kf has done. it goes against my major conference homedawg trend, but so be it. I think Illinois wins this by 17, but just my thoughts.Leave a comment:
-
usually if it looks to good to be true it is. but not in this case. iowas defense will have a hell of a time keeping up with illinois speed. if you break down the sagarin and each teams avg scoring on the year then the line looks about right. but the stats are misleading.Leave a comment:
-
The line that jumped out at me and looks really fishy is Illinois -3.5 @ Iowa. Iowa is dreadful right now and Illinois is playing some solid football.
Maybe a sandwich game for Illinois...in between Wisky and Michigan. But damn, I would have thought the line would have been higher than that. Indiana went to Iowa and won by 18 points....Illini went to Indiana and won by 13. Common sense would dictate a higher line, IMHO. But common sense doesn't get you far in the world of college football wagering.Leave a comment:
-
-
I think the best dog on the board this week is Purdue. How is Michigan's horrible defense gonna stop Purdue's offense. :dunno:Leave a comment:
-
:ohman:
At first glance Kentucky & Louisville may seem to be getting too many points, but IMO they could both be in for long days... LSU off a scare vs. Florida, I think they come out focused & pound the ball down Kentucky's throat. The Cardinals are just plain bad defensively, IMO Cincy likely wins by 2td. I have a very hard time seeing either one of these dogs coming close to cashing on the ML, but that's me...Leave a comment:
-
Wow some really interesting matchups this week....
im taking a good hard look into these games and some possible upset moneyline plays here
oregonst +13 1/2 @ cal
Missouri +10 @ oklahoma
Kentucky +9 1/2 vs Lsu
Washington +12 @ Arizona st
Auburn +3 @ arkansas
Purdue +5 1/2 @ michigan
Syracuse +17 1/2 vs Rutgers
Louiville +10 1/2 @ Cincinnati
liking all these ud's ats, and will probably play most of them.... some might consider for straight up wins... i have feeling we are gonna see 1 undefeated team at end of year which imo will be ohio st. (cup cake scheduel imo)
a couple favs this week lean'n towards..
sourh carolina - 6 1/2 @ north carolina
V-tech -13 1/2 @ duke
Penn st -6 1/2 vs wisconson
tcu -6 @ standford
Michigan st -5 vs indiana
memphis -4 vs middle tenn st.Leave a comment:
-
i like ucf, but they were up like 3 tds last week on crappy ECU and let them come back and win by like 14. Their lack of D scares me.Leave a comment:
-
:thumbs:I like Wake +6 against FSU on Thursday night at home.
I'm going to wait until later in the week to play it though because I think that line will go up as the public will hammer FSU on name recognition. But Wake isn't a bad team and FSU has really played no one thus far. They needed lots of defensive help just to put away a terrible NC State team at home last week. One thing that Wake won't do is beat themselves with turnovers and poor execution. I'm not sure that an anemic FSU offense can do enough to cover the spread which will likely be over a touchdown by game time.Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: