Is oklahoma the play?

[FlyersFan]

So much for Hawaii, lol

lol...another product of its schedule.........:puke:

[Rothko]

Yes but... its the best team that should be in the national championship, if you have a better overall record with more key wins and less powerful losses, you're a better team. Conference championships are solely dependent on conference wins/loss... you can lose them and still technically be a better team because of non conference wins and losses. Thats just how I see it, and thats how the bcs computes things.

I agree! If Ga doesn't play in the national championship the world should burn, burn, burn.... LOL!

[Stifler's Mom]

So much for Hawaii, lol

[yukoncornelius]

Becuase its OVERALL RECORD... not head to head matchups. How do you not see this?? Every sport works thsi way.

[Skinsfan]

Yes but... its the best team that should be in the national championship, if you have a better overall record with more key wins and less powerful losses, you're a better team. Conference championships are solely dependent on conference wins/loss... you can lose them and still technically be a better team because of non conference wins and losses. Thats just how I see it, and thats how the bcs computes things.

Not true.... How can you say that TECHNICALLY Georgia is better than Tennessee when Tennessee beat Georgia 35-14?

[yukoncornelius]

The BCS just sucks. That's about all there is to it, lol

Georgia is a fine team, but a non-conference champion playing for the national championship is like not winning your league in MLB or NFL, but still playing in the super bowl or world series on strength of schedule.

And that's just a plain stupid thought, IMO.

If NO ONE else, LSU has to go before UGA, just on the principle that they won the same conference that UGA did not.

Yes but... its the best team that should be in the national championship, if you have a better overall record with more key wins and less powerful losses, you're a better team. Conference championships are solely dependent on conference wins/loss... you can lose them and still technically be a better team because of non conference wins and losses. Thats just how I see it, and thats how the bcs computes things.

[FlyersFan]

oklahomo Lol

where's your Navy friend been all day to crow about Navy...hope he didnt pass out on the bowflex again

[Rothko]

oklahomo Lol

[FlyersFan]

I still say it's OSU, LSU, VTECH, UGA and then USC.....

[Stifler's Mom]

The BCS just sucks. That's about all there is to it, lol

Georgia is a fine team, but a non-conference champion playing for the national championship is like not winning your league in MLB or NFL, but still playing in the super bowl or world series on strength of schedule.

And that's just a plain stupid thought, IMO.

If NO ONE else, LSU has to go before UGA, just on the principle that they won the same conference that UGA did not.

[Irish Sooner]

Iguess OU was the play just like I thought, I did not expect the zebras to help Mizzou out though. Mizzou was a suckr bet. :beerbang:

[FlyersFan]

what do others "guess" the final BCS rankings will be?

[FlyersFan]

How do you people not get this.... its a mathematical equation. The strength of wins and losses are factored in... georgia isn't the "#3 sec team" like alot of you are saying... thats absurd.

well did they play in the CCG today yukon between the top 2 teams in the SEC?...maybe i was getting a different feed today.... i had LSU and TENN on CBS on my TV.....TENN won the East LSU won the West........:dunno:

[Skinsfan]

How do you people not get this.... its a mathematical equation. The strength of wins and losses are factored in... georgia isn't the "#3 sec team" like alot of you are saying... thats absurd.

how is it absurd? they finished with the 2nd best record in their own DIVISION of the conference

[FlyersFan]

dont get me wrong FF.... Georgia's schedule trumps pretty much anyone in contention right now (other than LSU)..... its not even close..... they played 7 teams that were ranked at one point or another this season.... its the principle..... deep down i believe that to be considered for the NC you must win your conference

hey im not saying anything to the contrary....but it happened with NEB about 6 or 7 years ago and they pretty much made it a point to say not again....remember NEB got anhilated by COL and didn't even play in the Big12 CG and still made the NCG.......UGA is a very good football team, but a #3 team in a conference shouldn't play for a NT under THE CURRENT SET OF CIRCUMSTANCES...which is all we can judge by at this point