Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Where to get an accurate number on where the PUBLIC is betting?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Where to get an accurate number on where the PUBLIC is betting?

    I have been using covers.com but they get there consensus details from wagerline.com. I dont think that wagerline.com accuratley portrays where the public is betting because the users of wagerline are probably more informed then the general public.

    Is there a site where you can get true public numbers from Vegas? If not, there should be....

  • akatdrake
    replied
    Awesome. Now I just have to get my login on Sportsbook to work! :thumbs:

    Leave a comment:


  • RahStahMan
    replied
    UPDATE for akat's current discussion with me and for all those that never saw this thread.


    Rather than email I used the more immediate live chat to get my answer.

    5:09 PM 3/4/2011

    Chat InformationYou are currently customer 1 in queue. An agent should be available in 0 Minutes.
    Chat InformationHello, my name is Anthony Quinn. I'll be assisting you today.
    You: hello anthony
    Anthony Quinn: Hello Paul.
    You: question:
    Anthony Quinn: Sure! what is your question?
    You: I had a question about your betting trends page. It is important to know the difference between the actual amount of money being bet on each side of a wager and not just that a higher or lower percentage of the public is betting on one side of a wager as opposed to the other side. The question is simply is the betting trends page updating the actual amount of money being wagered or the amount of bets being taken on each side of the game? For example: If 99 people placed 1 dollar on one side of a game (we'll say side A) and 1 person placed one 99 dollar wager on side B would the percentages show 99% on side A and 1% on side B or would the percentages read 50% on side A and 50% on side B?? The difference is enormous and I'm having a forum discussion on this information right now
    Anthony Quinn: Paul, I just noticed you are a VIP Sportsbook customer. I will transfer you to the VIP department.
    Anthony Quinn: I will let them know about your question.
    Anthony Quinn: Please hold.
    You: ty
    Chat InformationPlease wait while I transfer the chat to the appropriate department.
    Chat InformationHello, my name is Ace. I'll be assisting you today.
    You: ok
    You: If 99 people placed 1 dollar on one side of a game (we'll say side A) and 1 person placed one 99 dollar wager on side B would the percentages show 99% on side A and 1% on side B or would the percentages read 50% on side A and 50% on side B??
    Ace: Our betting trends are based in the percentage of money bet on the point spread of the game.(Sides). So if if you have $99 on side A and $99 on side B. The trends will show 50% on side A and 50% on side B
    You: TY very much sir
    Ace: It is based on the amount of money
    Ace: You're very welcome.
    You: i appreciate your time, that is all. thanks again.
    Ace: Is there anything else I can assist you with?
    You: no, ty
    Ace: Thanks for chatting. I am going to close the connection shortly. Please contact us again if you have any questions.

    Leave a comment:


  • jpix
    replied
    Bump

    good info some may have missed...

    Leave a comment:


  • yomonte
    replied
    I have been a die hard Oly player and its a damn shame Pinny got scared and cut out us US players. Alot of books were smart enough to get around that BS. The law was vague and my dumb ass was smart enough to see a loop hole that could have kept Pinny around. Pinny got scared, bottom line. How come most big books still cater to us. Scared, plain and simple

    Leave a comment:


  • yomonte
    replied
    IM me and give me the link to Pinny so I can get a real feel. I bank my money on pinnies open and close and have for years.

    Leave a comment:


  • Meestermike
    replied
    Originally posted by yomonte View Post
    Mike, SI showed Pinny down to -2 at one point
    That's exactly why I do not put much faith in SI very much. This feed result above is directly from the sportsbook.

    Now what and/ or who do I believe, the sportsbook where I play a lot or a service that tells you it is receiving the info from the sportsbook but is charging you $150 + per month to tell you that the line moved to -2 because they say it moved and there are 20 gazillion people betting on one side, but the sharps haven't appeared yet so the line is correct.

    I am a huge skeptic and am very cynical of these line services who charge premium $$$ for things that you can accurately get for free if you watch the book closely enough. Guess I feel it's like paying a service. Only difference is the services say that "it's guaranteed".

    Leave a comment:


  • yomonte
    replied
    Mike, SI showed Pinny down to -2 at one point

    Leave a comment:


  • Meestermike
    replied
    Here's an example of Pinnacle's line movement this week on the IND at JAX game
    Code:
    Indianapolis   vs   Jacksonville
    
    SIDE
    
    MONEY LINE
     
    TOTAL
    
    -3 +112 / +3 -120 Opener 10/14/2007 8:27PM
    -3 +116 / +3 -124 10/14/2007 8:28PM
    -3 +112 / +3 -120 10/14/2007 9:27PM
    -3 +108 / +3 -116 10/14/2007 9:30PM
    -3 +106 / +3 -114 10/15/2007 12:59AM
    -3 +104 / +3 -112 10/15/2007 10:17AM
    -3 +106 / +3 -114 10/15/2007 12:55PM
    -3 +105 / +3 -113 10/15/2007 4:22PM
    -3 +101 / +3 -109 10/15/2007 5:24PM
    -3 Even / +3 -108 10/15/2007 5:30PM
    -3 -102 / +3 -106 10/16/2007 10:50AM
    -3 -104 / +3 -104 10/16/2007 10:51AM
    -3 -106 / +3 -102 10/16/2007 11:08AM
    -3 -108 / +3 EVEN 10/16/2007 11:32AM
    -3 -109 / +3 +101 10/16/2007 11:35AM
    -3 -111 / +3 +103 10/16/2007 11:41AM
    -3 -107 / +3 -101 10/16/2007 11:44AM
    -3 -110 / +3 +102 10/16/2007 11:44AM
    -3 -114 / +3 +106 10/16/2007 3:59PM
    -3 -115 / +3 +107 10/16/2007 4:19PM
    -3 -119 / +3 +111 10/16/2007 7:36PM
    -3 -117 / +3 +109 10/17/2007 5:42PM
    -3 -118 / +3 +110 10/17/2007 5:43PM
    -3 -114 / +3 +106 10/18/2007 1:20PM
    -3 -110 / +3 +102 10/18/2007 1:37PM
    -3 -112 / +3 +104 10/18/2007 1:38PM
    -3 -109 / +3 +101 10/18/2007 1:38PM
    -3 -110 / +3 +102 10/18/2007 1:47PM
    -3 -111 / +3 +103 10/18/2007 2:00PM
    -3 -106 / +3 -102 10/18/2007 2:15PM
    -3 -107 / +3 -101 10/19/2007 2:52PM
    -3 -105 / +3 -103 10/19/2007 6:41PM
    -3 -106 / +3 -102 10/19/2007 7:02PM
    -3 -105 / +3 -103 10/19/2007 7:14PM
    -3 -106 / +3 -102 10/19/2007 8:40PM
    -3 -107 / +3 -101 10/21/2007 2:54PM
    -3 -106 / +3 -102 10/21/2007 5:14PM
    -3 -105 / +3 -103 10/21/2007 5:34PM
    -3 -107 / +3 -101 10/21/2007 10:35PM
    -3 -106 / +3 -102 10/22/2007 7:35AM
    -3 -107 / +3 -101 10/22/2007 7:36AM
    -3 -108 / +3 EVEN 10/22/2007 9:23AM
    -3 -110 / +3 +102 10/22/2007 9:51AM
    -3 -108 / +3 EVEN 10/22/2007 12:58PM
    -3 -109 / +3 +101 10/22/2007 2:34PM
    -3 -110 / +3 +102 10/22/2007 4:07PM
    -3 -108 / +3 EVEN 10/22/2007 4:57PM
    -3 -109 / +3 +101 10/22/2007 5:25PM
    -3 -110 / +3 +102 10/22/2007 5:57PM
    -3 -108 / +3 EVEN 10/22/2007 6:27PM
    -3 -106 / +3 -102 10/22/2007 6:57PM
    -3 -105 / +3 -103 10/22/2007 7:16PM
    -3 -106 / +3 -102 10/22/2007 7:39PM
    -3 -105 / +3 -103 10/22/2007 7:40PM
    -3 -107 / +3 -101 10/22/2007 7:45PM
    -3 -105 / +3 -103 10/22/2007 7:45PM
    -3 -106 / +3 -102 10/22/2007 7:52PM
    -3 -105 / +3 -103 10/22/2007 8:00PM
    
    -150 / +140 Opener 10/15/2007 10:17AM
    -148 / +138 10/15/2007 12:55PM
    -153 / +143 10/15/2007 5:24PM
    -155 / +145 10/15/2007 5:31PM
    -157 / +147 10/16/2007 10:50AM
    -160 / +150 10/16/2007 10:51AM
    -161 / +151 10/16/2007 11:15AM
    -163 / +153 10/16/2007 11:33AM
    -165 / +155 10/16/2007 11:41AM
    -169 / +159 10/16/2007 3:59PM
    -171 / +161 10/16/2007 4:19PM
    -175 / +165 10/17/2007 12:05AM
    -174 / +164 10/17/2007 5:43PM
    -170 / +160 10/18/2007 1:20PM
    -167 / +157 10/18/2007 1:38PM
    -170 / +160 10/18/2007 1:41PM
    -165 / +155 10/18/2007 2:15PM
    -161 / +151 10/18/2007 5:52PM
    -158 / +148 10/19/2007 6:42PM
    -161 / +151 10/20/2007 3:16AM
    -163 / +153 10/21/2007 2:46PM
    -161 / +151 10/21/2007 5:15PM
    -160 / +150 10/21/2007 7:00PM
    -163 / +153 10/21/2007 11:51PM
    -161 / +151 10/22/2007 12:24AM
    -160 / +150 10/22/2007 7:54AM
    -161 / +151 10/22/2007 9:23AM
    -163 / +153 10/22/2007 9:52AM
    -161 / +151 10/22/2007 2:34PM
    -158 / +148 10/22/2007 4:57PM
    -159 / +149 10/22/2007 5:58PM
    -160 / +150 10/22/2007 5:58PM
    -162 / +152 10/22/2007 6:26PM
    -159 / +149 10/22/2007 6:27PM
    -158 / +148 10/22/2007 6:38PM
    -160 / +150 10/22/2007 6:39PM
    -156 / +146 10/22/2007 6:57PM
    -155 / +145 10/22/2007 7:16PM
    -158 / +148 10/22/2007 7:44PM
    -156 / +146 10/22/2007 7:46PM
    -157 / +147 10/22/2007 7:52PM
    -155 / +145 10/22/2007 8:00PM
    
    o45 -105 /u45 -105 Opener 10/14/2007 8:27PM
    o45 +101 / u45 -111 10/14/2007 8:29PM
    o44.5 -103 / u44.5 -107 10/15/2007 4:56PM
    o44.5 +101 / u44.5 -111 10/15/2007 7:05PM
    o44 -104 / u44 -106 10/15/2007 8:04PM
    o44 -108 / u44 -102 10/16/2007 4:36AM
    o44 -110 / u44 EVEN 10/16/2007 4:25PM
    o44.5 -106 / u44.5 -104 10/16/2007 6:23PM
    o44.5 -112 / u44.5 +102 10/19/2007 12:51PM
    o45 -107 / u45 -103 10/19/2007 12:53PM
    o44.5 -110 / u44.5 EVEN 10/20/2007 8:44AM
    o44.5 -106 / u44.5 -104 10/21/2007 5:49PM
    o44.5 -110 / u44.5 EVEN 10/22/2007 1:03AM
    o44.5 -107 / u44.5 -103 10/22/2007 10:52AM
    o45 -103 / u45 -107 10/22/2007 10:53AM
    o45 EVEN / u45 -110 10/22/2007 4:07PM
    o45 +101 / u45 -111 10/22/2007 4:58PM
    o45 EVEN / u45 -110 10/22/2007 6:38PM
    o45 -102 / u45 -108 10/22/2007 7:16PM
    o45 EVEN / u45 -110 10/22/2007 7:28PM
    o45 +101 / u45 -111 10/22/2007 7:31PM
    o45 -102 / u45 -108 10/22/2007 7:37PM
    o45 -104 / u45 -106 10/22/2007 8:03PM
    o45 -102 / u45 -108 10/22/2007 8:05PM
    o45 EVEN / u45 -110 10/22/2007 8:12PM

    Leave a comment:


  • yomonte
    replied
    Hack, Could have been due to injury repost, weather or the 17% betting really big. As you can see, each book moved but not the same. Some books move cause others do anticipating getting hit. For instance, Week 8, Pinny had Philly -1 and moved to +2 or +3 while Oly went to -1 1/2. 5Dimes and Cris went to a pick and are still there. Now, Oly is still at -1 1/2 and now Pinny is back to -1. I would say that now 5Dimes and Cris will move back to -1. But these are very large books and might not be getting equal action. One thing about being a local and in a network of locals is that you can call and swap bets. Trading one action for another. Say I have alot of action on Atl and another has alot of action on NO. Next thing you know, they are winning on juice. I watch lines at SI like I watch neked girls. Although Pinny is back to -1 on Philly, they went to a dog earlier today. I almost bet Philly on that alone. Road favs that move to a dog are 4-0 this year. I bet at Oly and they went to -1 1/2 so I waited on that one. Still waiting

    Leave a comment:


  • El Hacko
    replied
    Heres a scenario

    Tell me what you would think about this game. I think I have this right.

    In the case of the South Fla-Conn game, 83% of the action is on South Fla. yet the line opened at -5.5 and has moved down to -4.5.



    Is this a game where you would want to "fade" and go with Conn as they are only getting 17% of the action (so far as number of "bets" and not a percentage of the dollar amount played on the game. The line has moved down in order to attract (what I would think) more South Fla action. Also, South Fla is picking up way too high a percentage of the action. I think I remember reading something about fading a team that has over 80% of the action as they more often than not, won't cover Joe Public's action. That is how I am reading this game.
    Last edited by El Hacko; 10-22-2007, 02:04 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Horfin
    replied
    Like always I am a little late.

    SI is a tool that you really need to use free or paid it is worth it.

    Wagerline is a good gauge of what to blindly fade, 60% or more just fade the ****ers (part sarcasm, part truth). There all idiots (See rjp post)

    Leave a comment:


  • Queen
    replied
    I Go againist the numbers at pinnacle. When you watch them pile on one side then about 60 percent of the time you will hit. I've been told Vegas does not release numbers. You can watch the board and figure out at each sportsbook what side somebody is on heavy. You can look at different sites and tell whos on what. Now Wagerweb is just a site where regular joes post pick and it gives you what side about 2000 people are on. It's a good fade site also.

    So the answer to your question is No there is not really a true site that gives public numbers.

    Leave a comment:


  • rjp
    replied
    Originally posted by Manute Bol View Post
    I dont think that wagerline.com accuratley portrays where the public is betting because the users of wagerline are probably more informed then the general public.
    :laughing:

    lmfao, most of these people are betting for contests and such, so it's a PERFECT gauge of how the majority is betting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Underdog88
    replied
    Originally posted by Stifler's Mom View Post
    Unfortunately, often times when I see people talking about fading the public, they don't go any farther than "There's 82% on Cleveland, I'm taking Chicago". IMO it's a good starting point, but I still think you need to find some reasons (that the public is missing) why the oddsmakers made the line what they did, probably knowing they'd take lopsided public action on Cleveland, and why Chicago is actually probably the better play.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X