Bet your house on Nebraska, MONEYLINE!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • emv01
    replied
    Originally posted by JoeStriker
    Ok let me rephrase what I just said. Yes I had money on USC -10 but BECAUSE the line moved to -9.5, Vegas and the sharps must know something that we know that assures USC won't cover 10... not even close. I am just so pissed that my bet is already a loser. EVERYTIME! Whenever the line moves a point towards the other side, no way the favorite can cover. On totals for instance, a line going from 59.5 to 61... this means the Over 59.5 is solid and so the game will likely go Over 61. Why would anyone change their minds on what to pick for 1.5 points? I love to see a line go from 10.5 to 12 because I just know -10.5 is solid and surely an 11 point win is unlikely.


    LOL so the line moves .5 and the Sharps and Vegas know something? Does that mean any line that moves .5 Vegas knows something? Lines move all the time, what happens if tomm the line is back up to 10, does that mean you should bet the house on USC? Since the line moved .5 Vegas and the Sharps must know something that we don't that assures us Neb won't cover the 10.. You still haven't explained the whole Leinhart, Bush, and White statement? Your bet is already a loser? You are a mess dude.. CUSE where are you at on the one, I thought for sure you would be all over this...

    Leave a comment:


  • JoeStriker
    replied
    Originally posted by Neyland
    Didn't I see in another post that you picked USC to hang 42 on the Huskers and beat them something like 42-17?
    Ok let me rephrase what I just said. Yes I had money on USC -10 but BECAUSE the line moved to -9.5, Vegas and the sharps must know something that we know that assures USC won't cover 10... not even close. I am just so pissed that my bet is already a loser. EVERYTIME! Whenever the line moves a point towards the other side, no way the favorite can cover. On totals for instance, a line going from 59.5 to 61... this means the Over 59.5 is solid and so the game will likely go Over 61. Why would anyone change their minds on what to pick for 1.5 points?

    I love to see a line go from 10.5 to 12 because I just know -10.5 is solid and surely an 11 point win is unlikely.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stifler's Mom
    replied
    Originally posted by MParris86
    Wait, so the early 2000's are over? Damn, I was going to take the Huskers ML but I guess Eric Crouch won't be playing. Who knows though, just heard he was released by the Toronto Argonauts last week. Maybe he has some eligibility left.

    LMFAO

    Leave a comment:


  • Livin tha Life
    replied
    Wow look at all the new friends that you've made. ........just so ya know......we are a lil supersticious when folks imply that a game is already won, before it has been played. Read the rules of the forum,and try again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Neyland
    replied
    Dude,

    Didn't I see in another post that you picked USC to hang 42 on the Huskers and beat them something like 42-17?

    Leave a comment:


  • homedawg
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • gladgarbage
    replied
    Read

    Originally posted by JoeStriker
    The line just moved from -10 to -9.5. Looks like Nebraska can win it outright. USC is way over-rated. No Leinart, Bush or White. I don't think they will make top 10 this year. Unless they win all their games in a sloppy way (small margin of victory) and they just give it to 'em (BECAUSE they're USC).
    the Freakin rules. Moron.

    Leave a comment:


  • EddieP
    replied
    even Kaopectate cant stop the juices runs:beerbang:

    Leave a comment:


  • emv01
    replied
    Originally posted by carlmcmas
    :laughing:
    Actually I think Tommy Frazier is going to be playing QB for Nebraska this week..

    Leave a comment:


  • carlmcmas
    replied
    Originally posted by JohnnyMapleLeaf
    ****...when did Leinhart, Bush and White leave? Hopefully Vegas didn't hear about that, or it might move the line further.

    Any status on OJ Simpson, Marcus Allen, Ron Yary, Charles White and Ronnie Lott?
    I hear Lott is questionable, and Allen is probable...

    :beerbang:
    :laughing:

    Leave a comment:


  • MParris86
    replied
    Wait, so the early 2000's are over? Damn, I was going to take the Huskers ML but I guess Eric Crouch won't be playing. Who knows though, just heard he was released by the Toronto Argonauts last week. Maybe he has some eligibility left.

    Leave a comment:


  • PhillyFan3
    replied
    JML....

    got some bad news for ya....Marcus Allen is definitley out, it sucks....just killed my USC play

    Leave a comment:


  • emv01
    replied
    Originally posted by JohnnyMapleLeaf
    ****...when did Leinhart, Bush and White leave? Hopefully Vegas didn't hear about that, or it might move the line further.

    Any status on OJ Simpson, Marcus Allen, Ron Yary, Charles White and Ronnie Lott?
    I hear Lott is questionable, and Allen is probable...

    :beerbang:

    Once I get confirmation OJ is playing I'll be on USC for 100 Units :beerbang:

    Leave a comment:


  • sdsurfn
    replied
    that post is internet chatboard gold! :nuts: :beerbang: :beer2:

    Leave a comment:


  • JohnnyMapleLeaf
    replied
    ****...when did Leinhart, Bush and White leave? Hopefully Vegas didn't hear about that, or it might move the line further.

    Any status on OJ Simpson, Marcus Allen, Ron Yary, Charles White and Ronnie Lott?
    I hear Lott is questionable, and Allen is probable...

    :beerbang:

    Leave a comment:

Working...