Week 8 Parlay

[Shamrock]

Thats what I'm thinking. that's why i lean towards a 27-14 type final in this game.

[DevilsAdvokt]

I only see more value in the over 36 than under 60 ONLY because new england's lowest scoring game this year is 34 points... i honestly dont think that stops here at home.... even if washington keeps this close than they themselves half to score 14+ cause i dont see washington on the road stopping this offense and keeping them under 28 points just doesnt seem possible to me

[JohnnyMapleLeaf]

Yeah...under 60 WAY better value than the teased over...wow....Washington with the anemic offence, and good defence...I might acually look at doing a teaser with that included...

:beerbang:

[DevilsAdvokt]

I just don't think everyone should put JP out to pasture yet...I mean he played 2 games against Denver and Pittsburgh...who just happen to be 2nd & 3rd in pass defence...Trent has had easier defences...THAT could be the difference.....and although Trent is a feel-good story, I'm not totally sold on him yet either...I hope he turns out to be a great QB...just like I hope JP continues to grow...

I tend to disagree with you here in that jp was the quarterback last year and they sucked monkey balls... no jp no mcgahee and + te and lynch = better off for bills now and future... IMO

[Shamrock]

Bad spot for NE? Has there been such a thing this year? Plus they're at home.....

Piling the points? I projected Wash PILING 14 points up........

Defends the pass well? AGAINST WHO???????

Wash has great defensive cord? What a crock of ****.....Wash's defensive coordinator isnt going to be the guy that FIGURES out NE.

You know what, lets put this conversation on hold until Sunday night.....too much silly **** flying around.

By the way HD, i'd take Jax +15.5 over tb +8.5 too. My point dealt with teasing the total of the NE game.

[JohnnyMapleLeaf]

You can't see the difference in the Bills offense since Edwards is in?

No, they're not all of a sudden the Colts or the Patriots or something, but seriously, they were flat out pathetic with Losman. It's easy for me to see they are a better offense with Edwards in there, and that he is by FAR a better QB than Losman.

The problem has not been moving the ball, but punching it in the end zone.

You're just looking at stats. They are deceiving. And I never said Edwards turned the team around, just that I heard about 52 million people say they were fading the Bills on MNF because of Edwards. What a silly reason....IMO.

I just don't think everyone should put JP out to pasture yet...I mean he played 2 games against Denver and Pittsburgh...who just happen to be 2nd & 3rd in pass defence...Trent has had easier defences...THAT could be the difference.....and although Trent is a feel-good story, I'm not totally sold on him yet either...I hope he turns out to be a great QB...just like I hope JP continues to grow...

[Stifler's Mom]

I see the better value in under 60 as well....when you consider the situations.

Bad spot for NE with Indy next week.

WSH has a patchwork offensive line. I can't see them piling the points on offensively.

WSH defends the pass pretty well.

WSH has a great defensive coordinator too. He'll find a way to at least slow NE and keep WSH in the game IMO.

[homedawg]

Yeah, ZERO sense, Washingtons schedule of mia, phl, nyg, det, gb, and zona just validates my point. They havent seen anything like NE. IMO their D is no better than Dallas and look what NE did there.

My point its either an Over play with NE or a NO play......

I see 27-14, worst case scenario. he's getting 36.........

I'm starting to really like TB as well, i'll lay 3.5/4 on that game. Have to look it over again, but that looks like the right side.

I could also go on and state: jax +15.5 has better value than tbb +8.5:beer2:

[homedawg]

Yeah, ZERO sense, Washingtons schedule of mia, phl, nyg, det, gb, and zona just validates my point. They havent seen anything like NE. IMO their D is no better than Dallas and look what NE did there.

My point its either an Over play with NE or a NO play......

I see 27-14, worst case scenario. he's getting 36.........

I'm starting to really like TB as well, i'll lay 3.5/4 on that game. Have to look it over again, but that looks like the right side.

I stated: the key is to find the best value!!!!!!!!!

I did not state o36 was bad, I just find better value on u60... Thats it!!!!!!!!!:thumbs:

[Stifler's Mom]

BTW, I don't think Joe Montana, Troy Aikman, Dan Marino, or anyone else could have stepped on the field with the current Buffalo offense and put up superior numbers.

I mean if BUF trades Edwards for Brady or Manning right now, are they all of a sudden a super bowl contender?

Just something else to think about....

[homedawg]

LOL, just giving my 2 cents. I love JAX this week....completely wrong fave IMO.

AFC over NFC, and I'm getting a dog line as well :thumbs:

I just don't see how anyone could think TB covers -3.5 comfortably, but it's easy to see how JAX could shut TB down and win outright....at least to me.

I was just givin' reasons NOT TO TAKE TBB:thumbs: public perception= books winnin'!!!!!!!!!!! ...... :beer2:

[Stifler's Mom]

Edwards really hasn't done much more than Losman would have, IMO...I mean he has a 71 QB rating, thrown one measly TD compared to 4 picks. I would actually have JP back in there. I would suggest it was a weak schedule, good defence and Special Teams by the Bills, and turnovers that have turned the team around, not Trent.

But yeah, maybe the Jax defence/ST does the same thing, and Gray looks good :dunno: we'll see Sunday!

You can't see the difference in the Bills offense since Edwards is in?

No, they're not all of a sudden the Colts or the Patriots or something, but seriously, they were flat out pathetic with Losman. It's easy for me to see they are a better offense with Edwards in there, and that he is by FAR a better QB than Losman.

The problem has not been moving the ball, but punching it in the end zone.

You're just looking at stats. They are deceiving. And I never said Edwards turned the team around, just that I heard about 52 million people say they were fading the Bills on MNF because of Edwards. What a silly reason....IMO.

[Shamrock]

Yeah, ZERO sense, Washingtons schedule of mia, phl, nyg, det, gb, and zona just validates my point. They havent seen anything like NE. IMO their D is no better than Dallas and look what NE did there.

My point its either an Over play with NE or a NO play......

I see 27-14, worst case scenario. he's getting 36.........

I'm starting to really like TB as well, i'll lay 3.5/4 on that game. Have to look it over again, but that looks like the right side.

[JohnnyMapleLeaf]

I heard all this same stuff about Trent Edwards when Losman went down too.

Edwards was a true rookie with no NFL experience, and that worked out ok.

Edwards really hasn't done much more than Losman would have, IMO...I mean he has a 71 QB rating, thrown one measly TD compared to 4 picks. I would actually have JP back in there. I would suggest it was a weak schedule, good defence and Special Teams by the Bills, and turnovers that have turned the team around, not Trent.

But yeah, maybe the Jax defence/ST does the same thing, and Gray looks good :dunno: we'll see Sunday!

[Stifler's Mom]

LOL, just giving my 2 cents. I love JAX this week....completely wrong fave IMO.

AFC over NFC, and I'm getting a dog line as well :thumbs:

I just don't see how anyone could think TB covers -3.5 comfortably, but it's easy to see how JAX could shut TB down and win outright....at least to me.